Expedition 2025 XLT(200A) 4X2 vs Mazda CX-9 2023 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Excellent towing ability
- Comfort and ride quality
Negative
- Fuel consumption is high
- Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
- The initial purchase price is high
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 287377
SAR 137450
SAR 276481
SAR 132250
SAR 3868
SAR 1850
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.49
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 73.4
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 325.04
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 288.92
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3827.03
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
210
6
4
Dimensions
8
7 Seater
5636
5075
2029
1969
1941
1716
3343
2930
592
407
Fuel Economy
11
11.9
107
74
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
8
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Cloth
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
12
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
6
/
Transmission
✓
/
10-Speed SelectshifteAutomatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
275/65 R18
/
275/65 R18
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
380 BHP
226 BHP
637
420
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
