Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT vs Ford Transit 2023 2.2L Custom 270S M/T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 155420
SAR 114792
SAR 149500
SAR 110458
SAR 2092
SAR 1545
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.64
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 5.81
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 46.48
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 40.67
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 205.84
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 180.11
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2423.6
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2120.65
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
Dimensions
3
3 Seater
2360
/
16
/
5915
4972
1950
2272
2280
2020
3860
2933
3500
/
6.4m
/
3180 - 1760 - 1605
/
9.3m³
/
1140
/
/
6000
Fuel Economy
12.6 Km/L
14.3
70
80
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
4.2
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
Transmission
6-Speed Automatic Transmission
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Macpherson Strut
/
Leaf spring rigid
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Drum
/
215/70R16C
/
215/70R16C
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
2.8
2.2 L
Diesel
Diesel
174
125 BHP
450
350
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
