Hiace Van High Roof DSL MT vs Lite Ace 1.5L GL MT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 147625
SAR 79568
SAR 142025
SAR 76540
SAR 1987
SAR 1071
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.64
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 46.48
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 205.84
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 252.81
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2423.6
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
43 L
Dimensions
3
2 Seater
2355
/
16
/
5915
4045 mm
1950
1665 mm
2280
1930 mm
3860
/
3500
/
6.4m
/
3180 - 1760 - 1605
/
9.3m³
/
1145
/
/
options.4,050 L
/
050 L
Fuel Economy
13.0 Km/L
14.3 Km/L
70
43 L
/
14.3 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
4.2
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Macpherson Strut
/
Leaf spring rigid
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Drum
/
215/70R16C
/
215/70R16C
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.8
1.5 L
Diesel
Gasoline
174
96 BHP
420
134 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Motor
/
134 Nm
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
