Hiace Van High Roof DSL MT vs Toyota Hiace 2023 2.8L Van High Roof A/T DSL Swing Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Price Comparison
SAR 147625
SAR 146292
SAR 142025
SAR 140760
SAR 1987
SAR 1969
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.64
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.64
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 46.48
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 46.48
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 205.84
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 205.84
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2423.6
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2423.6
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
/
160
Dimensions
3
3 Seater
2355
/
16
/
5915
5915
1950
1950
2280
2280
3860
3860
3500
/
6.4m
/
3180 - 1760 - 1605
/
9.3m³
/
1145
/
/
6200
Fuel Economy
13.0 Km/L
13.3
70
70
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
4.2
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
/
✓
Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Macpherson Strut
/
Leaf spring rigid
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Drum
/
215/70R16C
/
215/70R16C
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.8
2.8 L
Diesel
Diesel
174
174 BHP
420
420
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
