Hiace Van STD GAS MT vs Toyota Hiace 2022 2.8L Commuter A/T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Price Comparison
SAR 121694
SAR 155420
SAR 117070
SAR 149500
SAR 1638
SAR 2092
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.82
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 89.71
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 397.27
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4677.48
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Van
/
Engine / Motor
6
4
/
160
Dimensions
3
13 Seater
2155
/
16
/
5265
5915
1950
1950
1990
2280
3210
3860
3200
/
5.5m
/
2530 - 1760 - 1340
/
6.2m³
/
1045
/
Fuel Economy
9.1 Km/L
/
70
70
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
4.2
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Macpherson Strut
/
Leaf spring rigid
/
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Drum
/
215/70R16C
/
215/70R16C
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5
2.8 L
Gasoline
Diesel
277
154 BHP
351
420
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
