Cerato 1.6L LX vs 6 Pure Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish and distinctive exterior design
- Low fuel consumption
- Advanced technical system
Negative
- Limited storage space
- Lower engine capacity compared to competitors
- Less efficient sound insulation on highways
Positive
- Stylish and modern exterior design
- High internal manufacturing quality
- Great driving and control fun
Negative
- The back space may be tight
- The suspension system can be harsh on off road
- The interface of some technologies needs improvements
Price Comparison
SAR 84398
SAR 90634
SAR 81188
SAR 87167
SAR 1136
SAR 1220
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 244.65
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 244.65
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
210 km/h
4
4
/
2488 cc
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4640
4870 mm
1800
1840 mm
1440
1450 mm
2700
2830 mm
427
419 L
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
14.9
15 Km/L
53
62 L
/
15 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
128 BHP
185 BHP
154
250 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
