Land Rover Defender 2023 110 X (P400) vs TXL Comfort 1.6T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Superior off-road capability
- Luxurious and durable interior design
- Multiple options for powerful engines
Negative
- High price compared to competitors
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- A bit complicated infotainment system
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 14.7
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.82
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 102.9
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 61.74
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 441
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 264.6
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5365.5
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3219.3
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
208
200 km/h
6
4
/
1598 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5018
4780 mm
2008
1885 mm
1965
1730 mm
3022
2800 mm
1075
450 L
/
5 Doors
/
200 m
Fuel Economy
10.1
16 Km/L
90
50 L
/
16 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
400 BHP
290 BHP
550
400 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
