Mazda CX-5 2023 2.5L GT (AWD) vs Fortuner GX2 4X4 Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Reliability and well known Toyota quality
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Outdated internal technology
- Less stability at high speeds
Price Comparison
SAR 138045
SAR 139973
SAR 132825
SAR 134665
SAR 1858
SAR 1884
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.08
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 14.4
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 70.56
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 100.8
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 282.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 403.2
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3679.2
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5256
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
/
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4550
4795
1840
1855
1675
1835
2700
/
506
/
/
17
/
4
Fuel Economy
14.3
10.3
58
80
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
Driver Seat
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
Driver & Front Passenger + Driver Knee
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
8
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
6-Speed Automatic Transmission
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
Part Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)
Wheels/brakes
/
265/65 R17
/
265/65 R17
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
2.7 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
188 BHP
164 BHP
251
245
/
91
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
