Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) vs FORTUNER GX2 4X4 Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Reliability and well known Toyota quality
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Outdated internal technology
- Less stability at high speeds
Price Comparison
SAR 137450
SAR 139973
SAR 132250
SAR 134665
SAR 1850
SAR 1884
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.65
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 81.55
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 288.92
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 361.15
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4252.25
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
/
4
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
5075
4795
1969
1855
1716
1835
2930
/
407
/
/
17
/
4
Fuel Economy
11.9
10.3
74
80
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
Driver & Front Passenger + Driver Knee
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
6-Speed Automatic Transmission
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Front Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
Part Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
/
265/65 R17
/
265/65 R17
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
2.7 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
226 BHP
164 BHP
420
245
/
91
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
