Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
SAR 137450
TBD
SAR 132250
TBD
SAR 1850
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.13
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 63.91
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 288.92
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 283.03
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3332.45
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
/
4
6
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
5075
5115
1969
1980
1716
1920
2930
/
407
/
Fuel Economy
11.9
9.3
74
110
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Interior
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Safety
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
✔
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
Exterior
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Engine
2.5 L
3.3 L
Gasoline
Diesel
226 BHP
304 BHP
420
700
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
