Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus vs Territory Titanium Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Cohesive and stylish exterior design
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Balanced engine and steering performance
Negative
- Improve the quality of interior materials and assembly
- Modernization of technological and entertainment systems
- Improved suspension characteristics to reduce vibration
Price Comparison
TBD
SAR 135891
TBD
SAR 130755
TBD
SAR 1829
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.82
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 89.71
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 384.45
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 209.7
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4677.48
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
200 km/h
6
4
/
1798 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5100
4630 mm
1994
1935 mm
1756
1706 mm
3010
2726 mm
566
385 L
/
5 Doors
/
190 mm
Fuel Economy
9.1
15.9
/
60 L
/
12 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
12.3
/
✓
/
All Liquid Cluster
/
✓
/
Leather Trim
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.3 L
1.8 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
345 BHP
190 BHP
500
320
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
