T99 LIM vs X-TRAIL S 4WD 5 Seats Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
- Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
- High safety equipment increases confidence while driving
Negative
- Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
- Fuel consumption is high in the city
- The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved
Price Comparison
SAR 110917
SAR 114120
SAR 106681
SAR 109800
SAR 1493
SAR 1536
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 228.34
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 195.72
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Hide common specs
Car Information
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1805
/
20 inch
17
4800
4680
1915
2065
1685
1730
2870
2705
377
/
/
4
/
212
Fuel Economy
13.8
15.7
60
55
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
✓
✓
TFT
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
7
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
8
Driver + Passenger + Side + Curtain
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
12
4
Transmission
✓
✓
Automatic
CVT
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
Independent strut
/
Multi Link
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Electronic Parking
/
245/50 R20
/
245/50 R20
/
/
Disc
/
Disc
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
224
181 BHP
165
/
340
244
95
/
/
DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder
/
181 @ 6,000
/
244 @ 4,000
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
AUTO-ECO-SPORT-SNOW-OFF ROAD
/
Manual
