Volkswagen Polo 2017 Sedan SE vs Model 3 Rear Wheel Drive Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Outstanding driving and acceleration performance
- Advanced technology and intelligent user experience
- High efficiency and environmental sustainability
Negative
- Manufacturing quality needs to be improved
- Less comfortable seats on long flights
- Customer service experience may not always be consistent
Price Comparison
TBD
SAR 190943
TBD
SAR 183715
TBD
SAR 2570
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 244.65
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
225 km/h
4
/
/
American
Dimensions
4 Seater
5 Seater
4384
4720 mm
1699
2089 mm
1466
1441 mm
2552
2875 mm
455
682 L
/
4 Doors
/
138 m
Fuel Economy
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
15.4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Engine
1.6 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
105 BHP
325 BHP
153
420 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
10.5
/
options.Lithium-Ion
