Wrangler Sahara 2.0T vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Superior off-road capability
- Classic and attractive design
- Wide customization capability
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Driving comfort is less on ordinary roads
- The high price of fully equipped models
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
SAR 275796
TBD
SAR 265380
TBD
SAR 3712
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.14 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 16.31
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.13
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 114.17
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 63.91
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 505.61
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 283.03
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5953.15
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3332.45
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
6
1998 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4 Doors
/
4785 mm
5115
1877 mm
1980
1869 mm
1920
3007 mm
/
487 L
/
254 m
/
Fuel Economy
7 Km/L
9.3
87 L
110
7 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Halogen
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
3.3 L
Gasoline
Diesel
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
270 BHP
304 BHP
400 Nm
700
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
