Hiace Van STD GAS MT vs Ford Transit 2023 2.2L Custom 270S M/T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 121694
SAR 114792
SAR 117070
SAR 110458
SAR 1638
SAR 1545
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.82
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 5.81
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 89.71
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 40.67
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 397.27
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 180.11
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4677.48
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2120.65
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
4
Dimensions
3
3 Seater
2155
/
16
/
5265
4972
1950
2272
1990
2020
3210
2933
3200
/
5.5m
/
2530 - 1760 - 1340
/
6.2m³
/
1045
/
/
6000
Fuel Economy
9.1 Km/L
14.3
70
80
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
4.2
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Macpherson Strut
/
Leaf spring rigid
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Drum
/
215/70R16C
/
215/70R16C
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
3.5
2.2 L
Gasoline
Diesel
277
125 BHP
351
350
Technologies
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
